True crime: why is it popular and is it ethical?

Partners:

The world has gone mad for true crime – the real stories of serial killers, abductions and abusers. Crime podcasters and YouTubers gain audiences in the millions; Netflix is stuffed with documentaries about cold cases. Unsolved mysteries are particularly appealing: Madeleine McCann’s disappearance still draws mass attention from wannabe sleuths nearly two decades on.

Some accuse these entertainers of making light of serious crimes, and bring up potential emotional harm to victims’ families. This sensationalism, they argue, only desensitises us to the full range of human horrors. But fans defend their interest – and women seem to be especially drawn in. Certain enthusiasts argue the detailed descriptions of abduction, rape and murder make female fans safer; they become more aware of their surroundings, and learn to spot potential predators.

There’s also an argument that true crime brings the legal system into public scrutiny. Fans bring mistrials, ignored evidence and police malpractice to light. The level of exposure granted by this new media complex reduces the likelihood of the worst cases happening again. But others complain, as in last year’s Lucy Letby case, that excessive press coverage might prejudice ongoing legal cases.

How can we explain true crime’s contemporary appeal? Why are women more affected? Is there space in public life for these graphic tell-alls? Is it possible to reconcile the sensationalism of our mass media with genuine concern for the victims and their families?